Ferguson Shines A Stunning Light On the Crippling Reality Of The Politics Of Racial Economic Division In America Under The Reign Of U.S’s First African American President

The picture of the tragedy in Ferguson is not all that needs to been seen.

The picture of the tragedy in Ferguson is not all that it appears to be.

After viewing weeks of near wall to wall news coverage by the Establishment Media of tragic killing of Michael Brown in Ferguson, MO., there is one thing that I believe to be certain, and that is that again what we are being led to believe to be the truth is as far from the truth as the Earth is from Pluto.

The one thing that can cause Americans to become completely emotionally immerse and distracted are matters involving Race; particularly if it involves Caucasian verses the so-called African-American. And our emotional triggers have been seemingly extra sensitive since Mr. Obama, the first true African-American, has taken the seat of the President of the United States, to the point of near paralysis.

Is it just me, or does there seem to be more racial strife under this Administration than any in recent history, without any real provocation or explanation? From the issue with the Harvard college professor, the Trayvon Martin shooting case, the fact the nation’s highest ranking law enforcer, Atty.  Gen. Holder, seems to more vigorously measures the scales of justice to tilt more if the victim is black than white, to today’s new distraction in Ferguson, the issue of race has become more an extraordinary deformative issue these past 6 or so years.

Interestingly, as in the Trayvon matter, Mr. O has sought to interject himself in this recent matter involving a black male shooting by a white person. He sides publicly on that of the black male before the proper course of law and justice have been given its opportunity to run its course.  I can remember the Rodney King violence came after the verdict of the trial at least.
But this appears to be a method of operation with Mr. Obama not just here at home, but for matters of unrest in foreign lands too. For example, Egypt during the Mubarak protest and in other parts of the Mid-East, the so-called Arab Spring; in Libya when Qadhafi was attempting to combat domestic militant uprisings; in Israel’s conflicts with Hamas in the Gaza Strip; and here in the States, with Occupy Wall Street.  He has yet to find a social or political disturbance to publicly speak on where the authority is definitively in the right. He always sides with the mob or the anarchist. Interesting. What happened to the days of first siding with those first who are more likely to defend us from the mob, the shooters, or the anarchist, before we take the side of the mob, the shooters, or the anarchist? Maybe it’s what comes from being a community organizer.  Mr. O’s real talent is seemingly focused on organizing dis-order all over the world.

In the Ferguson tragedy there has been an exorbitant amount of energy spent on identifying the skin color of the shooter and the young man who was shot, and making it the focal point, rather than the reason why the shooting occurred in the first place. There is an effort to paint the black man as an innocent victim who was without provocation slain by a racist white police officer in broad day light. Yet the Media shows no interest in reporting the condition of the officer or his side of the event. All of this noise, chaos, violent protest, and drama being displayed by protestors, as well as elected officials, is in defense of the dead black man … before there has been an indictment handed down from the Grand Jury to determined if there has even been a wrong done legally, for there to be a case or trial. What if this were a young white man shot and killed by a white cop or a young black man shot and killed by a black cop, would we be viewing the same actions? Would Mr. Obama had even known the participants names? When has Mr. O or Mr. Holder mentioned anything about the hundreds of black youths slain by other blacks in the streets in Mr. O’s adopted home town of Chicago? Or when has he used his pulpit to draw attention on the increase in black on white assaults that’s spreading across that nation unabated?  Where is the wall to wall news coverage on these stories?

The real untold tragedy of Ferguson has to do with the fact the too many young black youths are not involved in the work force nor in the higher education system. The labor participation rate amongst blacks is at historic lows. The incomes of black households have declined greatly over the past 11 years. The number of out-of-wedlock children born in the black community is nearly 80%. At the same time we have an U.S Administration that grossly promotes high government regulation that drives high paying, low-skilled entry manufacturing jobs out oft he inner-cities and the country, expanding government dependency that reduces the incentive to do for self, as with Obamacare, and the importation of hoards of low-skilled foreign immigrants that does nothing but lessens job opportunities at livable wages for young blacks, and other Americans in general.

To get as a true idea of the truly perverted fixation that this Administration has on this incident and race, there were 4 Administration representatives at the funeral of the slain youth, who the jury is still out on whether or not he was totally innocent.  Yet, the Administration failed to send 1 representative to the funeral of General Greene, who was gunned down by Afhgan soldier, the first U.S General to be killed in a foreign conflict since Vietnam.  The presence of the Administration at two of the events could’ve highlights the nation’s solidarity and pride in the nation for the world to see, friend and foe.  He chose to highlight the one that highlights our division and our ugliness instead.  Interesting.

No this event did not happen in a vacuum. It is the consequences of decades of government social engineering that has created a psychologically dependent Black-American class with an extreme gross sense of entitlement; that have left black men, as well as women, searching for their proper roles; a decimated family and moral structure; and a society, due to unchecked unrestrained political correctness, disarmed with the ability to correct improper and socially destructive behavior.

The tragedy of Ferguson, is one that which is being played out all over the nation in the shadows. And it’s not about race, but economics.  It’s about how decades of liberal progressive governmental policies have left generations of citizens, particularly Black-American, socially dysfunctional.  It’s about how economics and race are being used masterfully by this Administration to divide the nation.  It’s all cloaked by a complicit Media, that no longer seeks to tell nor show the true story and inform nor educate- rather it seeks to enrich its pockets, distort and manipulate the story, and enhance its own progressive liberal agenda. But this story won’t remain in the shadows for much longer before we are all feeling its negative presence.  But it is up to us to question with boldness the reason why things are happening and stop just accepting what is presented for us.

A President Gone Rouge: Where’s The Outcry?

obama smug

The late U.S President Richard Nixon famously stated, “When the President does it, that means that it’s not illegal.” He was later removed from office by the people.

But my, my, my, my, my, how times have changed. And not for the better. Today the American people are faced with Nixon reincarnated on steroids and a complicit Congress that is seemingly more interested in being politically correct than constitutionally correct.

The nation is faced with an invasion of immigrants unlike in any other time deliberately instigated and enabled by the Chief Executive of the United States. Unwilling, or unable, to make his case to the American people why the nation needs to allow more immigrants, particularly those low skilled from south of the border, how the nation can financially afford the influx of such numbers, or explain how the nation could best assimilate such an influx of immigrants into our society at a time of unprecedented economic and employment troubles; Mr. Obama instead creates law at his desk, via Executive Orders.

From the moment Mr. Obama was placed into the Office he has  sought to move heaven and earth to impose his vision of America on America, by any means necessary.  Many of his actions have not just been on the line of legality, but totally over it.  His most blatant acts of lawful defiance and indifference has been his championing of Latin immigrants who seek to come and stay in the country “undocumented”; even at the expense of the nations domestic laws and social tranquility. Though there has been Presidents such as Teddy Roosevelt who have used their power of the pen to impose their interpretation of a law passed by the Congress, never has the one charged to enforce the laws of the land so blatantly chosen to ignore written laws, and write executive law and regulations unilaterally without care or consideration of the Branch that’s actually empowered to make law, i.e., the Congress.  Coupled with the curious fact there doesn’t seem to any true opposition to his power grab is even more problematic. Mr. O seems to be totally unconcerned about the negative effects that his actions will have on the nation. Or is this his intent?.

What makes Obama’s actions even more bizarre, is that to hear him speak of his having to ignore the Congress to get his policies enacted to the American people, the fact that the Congress will not blindly go along with his wants, he believes that we should be greatfull that he is working outside of the laws of the country.  Lets remember that Mr. O views the Constitution as “a Charter of Negative Liberties“.  It’s too restrictive on the powers of government.  If the head the Executive Branch believes that the laws of the nation are to be adhered to only when it’s convenient, how is the average citizen or the youngest amongst us to view laws or those in authority? And should we rest comfortably thinking that this precedent won’t be followed by future presidents to a even more greater degree?

The fundamental question we the people of America should be asking is, Whether we are to be ruled by a king or governed by a duly elected Legislature in concert with the Executive and Judicial Branches in accordance with the Constitution? Founder Alexander Hamilton discussed the king vs president comparison and how laws are to be properly enacted in the Federalist Papers #69 by saying, “The President of the United States is to have power to return a bill, which shall have passed the two branches of the legislature, for reconsideration; and the bill so returned is to become a law, if, upon that reconsideration, it be approved by two thirds of both houses. The king of Great Britain, on his part, has an absolute negative upon the acts of the two houses of Parliament. The disuse of that power for a considerable time past does not affect the reality of its existence; and is to be ascribed wholly to the crown’s having found the means of substituting influence to authority, or the art of gaining a majority in one or the other of the two houses, to the necessity of exerting a prerogative which could seldom be exerted without hazarding some degree of national agitation.” I would say that we are pretty agitated. Wouldn’t you? If we want a president who totally ignores the voices of the people via their representatives because they wont act as his wants, than it is a king that we truly want.  The powers of the Executive, as well as the government as a whole, were to be finite, defined, and limited, to ensure the liberties of the people and the tranquility and prosperity of the nation.

The desire of big business and government to import cheap labor in mass to the detriment of abled-bodied domestic labor is not new, as reported by Roy Beck in cdn.rollcall.com. We have today a government working against the betterment of the nation seemingly with impunity.  We today have one of the lowest labor participation rates in our nations history and a federal debt that is so negative it is going to be born by our posterity for generations.  We have a gross deficiency in moral governance and a evolving cancerous societal culture that denigrates the value of having a high ethical code.  That of hard work in particular.  We do not have a domestic labor shortage, despite the constantly repeated political mantra.  If that were the case wages would not be stagnant or declining as they are. How is flooding the nation with more low-skilled immigrants who many seeks to take even more from our coffers that we do not actually have going make us as a nation more prosperous?  How does imposing laws in one way for the benefit of one group of people and in a different way, or not at all,  for another make us more just? More united?

What is vastly different today is the grotesque level of Saul Alinsky-like techniques of word manipulation, deception, and dishonesty presented by Mr. Obama and the lack of resolute moral governance by the people’s representatives. A unrestrained government, one that sees no bounds to its authority, that deliberately tramples on the line between legal and illegal at the expense of the will of the governed, is by definition a tyrannical government.  But, we the people have to posses a definitive moral constitution for those who represent us to.  We have to be knowledgable of the of the proper role, authority, and function of government.  We have to be informed and engaged on political matters and the actions of the government. If we have a president who acts illegally, a government that chooses not to govern, but rule, or have laws made that are unlawful, it is up to each of us to check him or them.  At the end of the day our silence is our quiescence.