Imagine for a moment, if you were raised in a home where your father repeatedly verbally, emotionally, and physically abused your mother. Do you think that might influence how you treat members of the opposite sex in a relation? Imagine if you were raised in home were the lack of money was the norm and going without was a reality. Do you think that might effect how you value money and how you pursue things that brings your pleasure and joy in life? Imagine you as a boy being raised in a home of dominant female and feminine influence, or a woman raised in a home of dominant male and masculine influence. Do you think that might have an effect on how you relate to the opposite sex, or matters of sexuality in general? And imagine being raised in a home dominated by Muslim or Christian religious, or Liberal or Conservative political views. Do you think that might mold how you view religion or politics as an adult? The majority of us would answer these questions with an emphatic yes. How we are raise and the environment in which we are raised effects us in our adulthood, for better or worst. This being the case, why do so many of us seem to be extremely psychologically resistant to the slightest thought that a man who was raise in a home dominated by his mother, who was an extreme socialist/communist, had two dads, who were from foreign countries and were socialist and Muslim, who was greatly influenced by individuals who were of the extreme socialist/communist persuasion, and who during his formative years grew up in foreign lands, that didn’t hold America or the West in high esteem, with a dominant Muslim influence, and did not come to the Continental United States of America until his college years, might have a psychological posture that is Muslim, socialist/communist, and that does not hold traditional American values and appreciation in high esteem? Even if this man is the President of the United States.
In the twilight of the Obama Administration there is a sudden dust up over the comments of former NY Mayor and former Presidential Candidate Rudy Giuliani at a recent event where he voiced his opinion regarding Mr. Obama that, “I do not believe, and I know this is a horrible thing to say, but I do not believe that the president loves America….He doesn’t love you. And he doesn’t love me. He wasn’t brought up the way you were brought up and I was brought up through love of this country.”
In typical liberal fashion, the uproar is not about whether what he said is true or not, it is not over the validity of his statement, but over the fact that Mr. Giuliani, with his stature, said it, in public. What I find most interesting, is that the same Media who without solicitation can go to the elementary periods of Mr. GW Bush, Mitt Romney, and Scott Walker to report on the most obscure and irrelevant events in their lives, but seems most uninterested in reporting anything that Mr. Obama has done in his past. At all! Its as though Mr. O was immaculately spit out of ether to appear of the stage of the 2004 National Democratic Convention. And this guy is now the President of the United States! Can you say Media Bias!
Here are some O facts that may want you to say HUUMMM!:
In a 2007 report by Daniel Pipes, Was Obama A Muslim, “Obama’s mother, divorced from Obama’s father, married a man from Indonesia named Lolo Soetoro, and the family relocated to the country from 1967-71. At first, Obama attended the Catholic school, Fransiskus Assisis, where documents showed he enrolled as a Muslim, the religion of his stepfather. The document required that each student choose one of five state-sanctioned religions when registering – Muslim, Hindu, Buddhist, Catholic or Protestant.”… “His former Roman Catholic and Muslim teachers, along with two people who were identified by Obama’s grade-school teacher as childhood friends, say Obama was registered by his family as a Muslim at both schools he attended. That registration meant that during the third and fourth grades, Obama learned about Islam for two hours each week in religion class.”
In a ’08 article on Articlebase.com, Barack Obama’s Connections to Socialism, Communism and Racial Divisiveness, Barack’s biological father, Barack Hussein Obama, “was an African socialist,”; His mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, “was a 60’s liberal feminist and an atheist.”; People of major influence in his life were – Frank Marshall Davis, “was a member of the Communist Party (USA). He was also a former community organizer in Chicago.”…Saul Alinsky, “was an avid and open socialist and the king of social activism, commonly called the “father of community organizing.” He created many organizations that relied on street agitation tactics, such as the Industrial Areas Foundation, which trained Obama in organizing tactics.”; Reverend Jeremiah Wright, of the “God-Damn America fame,– “Uncle J” was Barack’s former pastor and mentor at Trinity United Church of Christ. The philosophy of the Church is based on the teachings of James Cone’s black liberation theology. Cone admits that his theology is a mix of “black religion and Marxist philosophy.”; and William Ayers – “Mr. Ayers is an unrepentant domestic terrorist and an anti-capitalist. He was a leader of the Students for a Democratic Society (SDS) in the 1960’s and one of the militant spin-offs, the terrorist Weather Underground organization”… “Bill Ayers served for six years on the Chicago Annenberg Challenge (CAC) with Barack Obama. Both men headed up separate branches of the CAC that worked together on project funding. He also served on the board of the Woods Fund with Obama for three years. In 1995, Ayers hosted the event at his house which would become the kick-start to Obama’s political career.”
In a 2012 article in FrontPageMag.com, –Barack Obama, the Socialist, it quotes “John C. Drew, an Occidental College graduate who knew Obama personally in the early 1980s, reports that the young Obama of that period was “already an ardent socialist Marxist revolutionary”; was highly “passionate” about “Marxist theory”; embraced an “uncompromising, Marxist socialist ideology”; harbored a “sincere commitment to Marxist revolutionary thought”; and was, in the final analysis, a “pure Marxist socialist” who “sincerely believed a Marxist socialist revolution was coming to turn everything around and to create a new, fairer and more just world.
His actions may speak louder. From his now infamous apology tour soon after his first election in ’09, when he sought to apologize for America’s greatness. His relentless attack on Christian traditions of the nation to include the military, and his unprecedented act of endorsing same-sex marriage. His favorable posture towards the Islamic group, the Muslim Brotherhood, and Islam in general, while he alienates the only mid-east democracy and this nation’s long standing ally in the region, Israel. To his purposeful reduction and degrading of the United States’ military and economic dominance by dramatically reducing the nation’s military to pre-WW2 levels, while Communist China, Russia, Iran grow and expand their militarily and influence, and saddles the taxpayers and the nation with unsustainable debt with his gross expansion of the federal government.
Lets get away from the mentality of assassinating the messenger for messages that we do not favor. But examine the message and the sources thereof. Take upon the responsibility of doing your own research. What Mr. Giuliani said of my Mr. O was not incorrect, unknown, nor untrue to those of us who have delve past Mr. O’s masterfully choreographed public image. There has been two blockbuster doc-movies describing this man’s past and possible intentions for this nation – Obama 2016 and America: Imagine the World Without Her, as well as countless books and articles written on Obama and his controversial past. Throughout all of the vociferous condemnation of anything or anyone who dares to point out the environment and influences of the past of this man, who is now arguably the most powerful political figure in the world, and how the manner in which he was raised effects him as not just as an any adult, but the President of the United States, the one thing that you do not hear from the Obama defenders and excusers is that the statements are untrue, fictitious, or wrong. They just sling stones in the hope that the display will keep most of the spectators dazzled and distracted.
The sheer fact that any person with such a concerning past would not invite the most investigative process, not only by the political process and federal vetting agencies, but the Media, and making their findings public, before getting a sniff of the Office. Much credit must be giving to the producers of this great production. We have entered an era where it is more important to be “politically correct”, than correct. Even when it comes to who is placed in the most powerful office of the land. Mr. O is who and what he has always been. Much of his past is public information, less then before he became anointed president though. It would have been nice if he would have stood and openingly and honestly shown himself for what he is. But if we the people don’t fervently ask the questions, whose fault is it, truly? Many of us didn’t want to know the truth. The truth would have been too unpopular and uncomfortable. Still is to too many. As Jack said, “You can’t handle the truth!”
It is evidence of an American populace who have lost their thrust to question boldly of the people of the United States what their true intentions and motives are and purpose therefor. Eternal vigilance has been replaced with zombie-like myrmidonism who mostly seek out the path of convenience, popularity, and pleasure. Never to be disturbed with matters of self- governance and self-responsibility. How else can one explain that someone who literally came out no where, spent less than half a term in the U.S Senate, displaying no record of legislative accomplishment of note, repeating a mantra of “Hope and Change”, and yet never asked to detail the context nor content, to be elected the President of the United States, TWICE!?
The statement of Mr. Giuliani echoes in the minds of many, even those who genuinely hoped for good change from the man of great promise. To not fundamentally change this great nation, but to improve it. To make us better. The question is, are we still asleep?