Posts

The Government & Establishment Reaction to Charleston and Orlando Shootings Exhibits Extreme Agenda

 

This is a face of a "self radicalized" man.

This is a face of a man “self radicalized”.

 

Okay, it has been over a week since the tragedy of the shooting at a night club, frequented by Americans of the homosexual persuasion, by an individual of Arab decent espousing and sympathetic to the extreme hateful ideology of Islam who killed nearly 50, injured another 54,  and I have not heard the Media nor the Administration condemn the followers, icons of Islam, symbols of Islam, nor descendants of people of the Islamic ideology as symbols of hate that should be erased from public view and scorned.  In fact, the Media, in particular the U.S Administration, and the whole national Democrat Party have strenuously attempted to detach the shooter, who has obvious ties to radical Islamic ideology and individuals, from any notion that he had any connection, rather directly or indirectly, to the radical terrorist group ISIS [Islamic State of Iraq & Syria], nor the teachings of Islam in any way.  The president himself has publicly denounced any notion of the gunman in the Orlando tragedy being anything more than a “lone gunman” acting on his own behest and without any negative influence from ISIS theology or ideology or Islam, and that it is the fault of his ability to lawfully get a gun that the tragedy occurred.

This is the face of hate and evil heritage

This is the face of hate and evil heritage

The reaction of Obama Administration and the complicit Media surrounding the Orlando shooting is in stunning contrast to their reaction to the Charleston, South Carolina church shooting killing 9 black-Americans by an assailant who was of Caucasian-Southern decent, and has been shown in a picture with a Confederate Battle Flag.

 

The president and his agents immediately rapped the shooter in the Confederate Flag and made every icon of southern history, every symbol of the south, and anyone and anything that could be vaguely associated with past southern heritage, ideology, or pride, complicit in the actions of this “lone gunman”.  Of course the fact that he was able to get a gun from his parents was also reason for the carnage.  Not the fact that he was just someone with deep mental issues.

In the wake of the gross anti-southern heritage propaganda of the Administration and its Media accomplices, streets and school names of southern idols had to be renamed.  Monuments of southern heroes were removed or threatened with removal.  And anything vaguely resembling the Confederate flag or southern heritage was, and still is, threatened with extinction from public view.  But in the case of a man with obvious affiliation of radical Islam at most, and who held ISIS ideology in high regard at the least, we are to believe these facts had nothing to do with the Orlando shooter’s drive to commit the crime; that it was the availability of lawfully purchased guns in the American society. And not that federal and local law enforcement have been virtually neutered due to extraordinary restrictive rules of engagement regarding dealing with Muslims by the Administration.

Lets keep in proper context that the American Civil War occurred well over a century ago, slavery was officially outlawed in the U.S and America in 1865, while radical Islam has been at war with western culture and ideology since Jefferson had to send the Marines to Tripoli, an followers of radical Islam are killing and causing havoc all over the world today in a most horrific way.   Yet the president of the United States, the leadership of the Democrat Party, and the Establishment Media wants us to believe that lawful gun ownership, Conservatives, Christians, Southerns, and the Republican Party are a greater threat than radical Islam.  Amazing!  Stunning!  And Dangerous!

Imagine if we as a nation were told by  President Roosevelt that reason for the Japanese bombing Pearl Harbor was due to the notion that there were too many U.S military ships in an area that Japan wanted to control; that it was our fault for instigating the attack on us.  Image if we were told by the U.S president prior to either World War One or Two that the reason for German’s aggression towards its European neighbors was not due to its belief or ideology of German world dominance or Aryan ethnic supremacy. Evil is evil. Just because he or she is so. A tragedy is a tragedy.  Just because it is.  Anyone who poses a threat to our way of life is a threat to us all, no matter their ethnicity, religious affiliation, nor sexual orientation, and should be identified as such and dealt with appropriately.  Terrorism has less to do with the actual event than how those who where targets respond and deal with the act.  Do we take bold and rational acts to defend ourselves and see to it that no such act(s) are carried out by the perpetrators?  Do we panic?  Or do we inflict more injury upon ourselves by turning on each other and psychologically doing what those who attracted us in the first place sought to achieve, by living in fear and mis-trust of each other?  If the face of the U.S government cannot or will not tell the American people the truth in the time most critical, and at worst seeks to deceive and manipulate us by Orwellian double speak and word contortion when we are most at risk of being targets of terrorist or our enemies, whether it be from within or from without, this nation is in true peril.

 

 

 

 

 

 

If The Child Runs Amuck, Look First At The Parents

As we look at the drama and terror being perpetrated by our nation’s youths, attention is being focused on guns, drugs, such as Ritalin and Prozac, and violent entertainment, such as video games and TV or movies.  While all of these issues may be elements of the unprecedented violence and social degradation involving young people as young as 10 years old, there seemingly is an extreme reluctance to look towards failed parenting, particularly the contagion of single-parent households.

In a study reported in the U.K’s Dailymail.co.uk September 2011 issue, Why grandparents secretly think THEIR children are such poor parents, it highlighted what I call “buddy-parenting”.  It’s when parents are more concerned with being the buddy of their child more so than being their disciplinarian.  They have forsaken the responsibility of actually raising their children, that they created, and giving that responsibility to others, or the government. They go to great measures to see that their child’s esteem is never damaged, that they rarely, if ever, hear the word no or given strict boundaries to govern their actions and measure their responsibilities.  Their child is rarely, if ever, taught to be accountable for his or her actions, or that his or her actions have consequences, both good and bad.  But, maybe must important is that their child is rarely, if ever, taught that there is something greater than themselves,i.e. a God, or to respect authority, even if the authority figure is the parent themselves.

I don’t think that anyone can look in our past where there has been so many reports of young people running amuck not just committing property damage or petty theft, but assaults and murders with seemingly impunity or such a lack of fear of retribution.  When I was growing up and left home I knew that I was representing my home and my parents.  There used to be a saying, “act like you have some home training.” Isn’t it funny how we don’t hear such moralist sayings these days?  And if I was to ever mis-behave in public, I knew to expect some form of retribution, i.e. belt to the behind or doing extra chores, to be brought by my parents, or authorized surrogate or stand in. I would not be given a pill nor “time out”.

But that type of culture seems to be so repugnant to today’s America that to even hint at reinstituting discipline to children, such as corporal punishment by parents, i.e. belt to the behind, to have them show humility or respect  by saying thank you, excuse me, no ma’am or sir, yes sir or ma’am, allowing for children to feel the sting of failure and rejection, or to let them know that they are not adults at the age of 5, therefore they will respect authority and be subordinates till he or she earns or reaches a proper level or age of understanding, is seen as near acts of child cruelty. Picking up or even touching my dads guns or taking my parent’s property without their permission never ever entered my mind when I was young and living in their home; let alone taking one of his guns and going on a killing spree.  Running around with a bunch of other kids and acting unruly causing damage or crimes was feared more by what punishment would be brought by my parents and the shame and embarrassment to my family more than anything anyone else could do to me.  Acting discourteous or disrespectful towards either of  my parents or grandparents or seeking to harm them in any way, even to this day, is no less foreign of a thought than my going to the Moon and Mars. For they created me.  And all that I am or will be is due to them.  A lot of you can relate. Or is it just me?

Can you ever imagine seeing a young lion cub sniping at the head lion of the pack or being disrespectful?  Do you think that that pack would last for long as a cohesive and well-functioning unit allowing such behavior to fester and grow? I dare say the whole social order of that pack would disintegrate and leave them vulnerable to their enemies.  This is what is happening to our society.  We today are beset with generations of young people growing up grossly over indulged, with an overly exaggerated belief of entitlement, with no or little respect for authority and elders, and with no or little understanding of the relation between actions and consequences.  And if that is the case than the first to be examined should be the quality and qualifications of the parent or parents to teach and raise him or her properly.

Children are born good, until they learn or are conditioned to be otherwise.  Similar to what Ben Franklin said outside of the Continental Congress in Philly after the signing of the Federal Constitution, “we have a republic, if we can keep it.”   We as Americans, unlike any other nation, are the creators [parents] of our government, particularly the federal government. We created it.  We gave it instructions  and boundaries on how to act and conduct it’s business so as not to bring shame or dishonor to us, as a people and as a nation, via the Constitution. A good argument can be made that the government today, with its gross over-spending, acting seemingly with no regard to accountability or respect for traditional mannerism and conduct, is behaving like little children grossly over indulged, with an overly exaggerated belief of entitlement, with no or little respect for authority and the people who they serve and who created them, and with no or little understanding or care of the relation between the actions that it takes today and the consequential effects that they will have on the nation’s posterity.

America was established to be the greatest republic ever.  But the Founders knew and understood that it would take eternal vigilance, caring, and strict overseeing by the American people to keep their government in line.  Just as it takes the same effort from the parents of children to keep them in line.  But we as Americans have spared the rod far too often and have allowed our government run amuck, disrespecting the traditional values of the elders, acting without accountability, and taking liberties of the people without knowledgeable consent or permission.  The only pill is the reestablishment of a politically engaged and vigilant populous who are willing to take responsibility for their own actions as well as those the elected servants and hold them accountable when they get out of line.  Because at the end of the day what ever the government is, or is not, is owned by the American people.